How we measure: the method behind our numbers

Every billing tool claims results. We publish our method before our numbers — so when the numbers come, you can check how they were made.

The design

Multi-practice measurement on tomedo and medatixx, in real daily operation. For every patient contact, meda reads the finished documentation and suggests the documented but unbilled codes. Every suggestion, every doctor decision — bill, reject, unsure — and every reason is logged.

What we count, and what we refuse to count

We count only physician approved codes: services the documentation supports and a doctor confirmed. Rejected suggestions count against us, publicly. We do not count projections, do not extrapolate from best cases, and do not quote a number before the measurement closes.

Why the doctor's rejection matters most

A suggestion a doctor rejects is the most important data point we collect. It trains the reading, and it is the difference between recovery and upcoding: the measured result is, by construction, only what physicians decided was correct.

What publishes

The method, the practice profiles, the acceptance rates, and the recovered positions — with the KV review register in mind: everything traceable to documentation. When it publishes, it publishes whole. Until then, this page is the promise you can hold us to.